Stats

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Week 4 Preview - North Carolina State

Before I write the blog every week I like to read the message boards of various sites like espn.com, the AJC, and the Hive, and try to get a feel for the pulse of Yellow Jacket nation. This week, I was disappointed to see that it seems most everyone feels the 9 point spread that Vegas gave us is “absurdly high”. The consensus from most fans seems to be that any win would be good, and they would not take us with that many points. Everyone seems genuinely confused as to what Vegas was thinking.

I can tell you why Vegas gave us that many points. First of all, the majority of the nation does not really pay attention to teams that closely. They are probably aware that we lost to Kansas, but most probably don’t know exactly how bad of a loss that is. A lot of Vegas bettors will probably be aware that GT is the defending ACC champs, playing at home, and N.C. St. didn’t even go to a bowl last year. And remember that Vegas sets the line in an attempt to get half the money on both sides, so all they really care about is what the typical bettor thinks.

But more importantly, I don’t think the line is off in terms of the way the game should actually go. In fact, in my weekly picks, I took GT to cover. The simple reason for this is that we are a bad matchup for N.C. St. I do think the Wolfpack are improved, and are a pretty good team. But you have to look at how they play.

First of all, their defense is undersized, but fast and scrappy. That does not matchup well against our offense. The number one most important thing to do to stop us is to get a good push up front and have your defensive line get off some blocks. If they can do that, they can limit Nesbitt and Allen running up the middle, which forces everything wide and allows the linebackers to pursue the corner without hesitating. It also prevents our O line from getting downfield and blocking linebackers and safeties. An exaggerated example of this effect was the Iowa bowl game last year. They shut us down almost entirely because their defensive line completely dominated our offensive line. N.C. St. will not be able to win the battle up front. In fact, I expect us to get a pretty decent push. Allen should be able to get 3 or 4 yards pretty easily, and more on some plays. That will distract the linebackers, making them hesitate and focus too much on Allen, which obviously opens the door for Nesbitt and the A backs on the corner.

Furthermore, a lot of N.C. St.’s success on defense comes from good blitz packages. We are not really a team you can blitz. Blitzes work best against a relatively stationary target, like a QB in the pocket. When you blitz us, all you tend to do is get guys in the backfield in the wrong place, and take away guys down the field that might have made a tackle. We are still going to block the guys that we need to block. If you overload one side on a blitz, we will probably just run the other way. At best, if you disguise it well, and manage to overload blitz the correct side, you will eventually get burned by guessing the wrong side if you try to do this more than once or twice. Unless you can correctly figure out which way we are running on every play, but then you could likely stop us without blitzing. Main point being, if NC St. blitzes much they are likely to see a lot of Allen and the A backs sprinting toward the end zone.

So they won’t be able to blitz us very well, and the hesitation that our offense causes will negate some of their speed. They do not have the size to give us problems. On top of all of that, throw in the fact that our offense tends to start clicking sometime around week 4 or 5. 2008 Miss. St. and then last year against UNC were both week 4. I know we didn’t have a great game offensively against UNC last year, but we did gain over 400 yards against a really good defense. And then we really played well against Miss. St. in Week 5 of 2009. I think the combination of us starting to get a rhythm and N.C. St. being a good type of defense for us to play against will lead to us scoring a lot of points.

What about our defense? Most GT fans are very down on the defense, and with good reason. We have not been very good. We have played excellent defense in the fourth quarter two games in a row, which shows that Groh may be as good as advertised at making adjustments. But we do look weak up front and we have not tackled very well.

BUT, again, look at how N.C. St. plays. They are a good offense, but they are very much a finesse offense. Wilson is a very good passer down the field, dropping passing into seam routes and scrambling if nothing is there. Their running game is based on speed, mostly running wide. They do not power block or power run very well. All of that will help us because they will not be very good at attacking our two primary weaknesses. They aren’t very strong up front, so our weakness is not a huge problem. And for the most part they are not very powerful runners. They run around people not through them. So they will not be terribly good at breaking tackles.

Meanwhile, our defense has good speed and is generally tough to run wide against. Specifically, I remember two plays against UNC, a sweep and a reverse, where they tried to run wide and we pursued with 3 or 4 defenders and easily stopped both runs for losses. There were several similar plays against Kansas. Additionally, aside from a handful of busted coverages, we have actually played pretty well in pass defense.

Now, to be fair, just because we are “pretty good” at these things does not mean we can shut down N.C. St. Russell Wilson is very good, and they have some playmakers and a really good offense. I expect them to score on us. I expect us to have a busted coverage or two, and Wilson to scramble. But our defense will likely play better overall than it has to this point, for the reasons listed above.

Finally, as bad as we are, we may be the best defense that N.C. St. has played thus far. Cincy and Central Florida do not impress me that much.

Now, it is certainly possible that we may not execute terribly well, or that we will show up flat since we are 9 point favorites. And while we are capable of beating a very good team, we do not have the athletes or the power on either line necessary to be able to beat pretty good teams without our A game. So showing up flat or executing poorly would probably mean we lose this game. But I don’t expect either of those things to happen. I think given the return home and this being the 4th game of the season, we will be pretty sharp. And I think the Kansas game is fresh enough that Paul Johnson won’t let us be flat.

I expect us to score around 35 to 42, and I expect us to hold them to 21 or so. Of course, if the last two games tell us anything, they will probably get most of those 21 in the first half, before Groh really starts adjusting. Provided we do show up to play, of course.

As usual, let’s take a look at the stats and the “talent”, based on the recruiting rankings.

GT

N.C. St.

Rush Yards Per Game

345

140.3

Rush Yards Per Carry

6.05

3.76

Rush Yards Allowed

154

85.33

Rush Yards Allowed/Carry

4.13

2.67

Pass Yards Per Game

68

263

Pass Yards Per Att.

8.6

7.3

Pass Yards Allowed

160.67

108.67

Pass Yards Allowed/Att.

6.25

8.0

Yards Per Play

6.3

5.5

Yards Per Play Allowed

4.9

5.1

Points Per Game

32

35.3

Points Allowed Per Game

20.7

15.7

Neither team has played a very difficult schedule, but I think ours has been tougher. According to Sagarin, we have played the 75th hardest schedule, and they have played the 114th. So you can take a lot of their stats with a grain of salt. I think it is noteworthy that we have a substantially better margin in terms of yards per play and yards per play allowed, and that is against a tougher schedule.

Let’s take a look at the recruiting ratings for the past few years, which is supposed to show talent. But of course, the past two weeks, the team that is substantially less talented according to this analysis has lost. So take it for what its worth.

2007

2008

2009

2010

GT

NCS

GT

NCS

GT

NCS

GT

NCS

Best

81

79

80

83

80

79

80

81

Top 5

79.4

78

78

80.6

79.4

78.2

79

79.4

Top 10

78.5

75.4

77.3

79.3

78.8

77.7

78.2

78.5

Avg.

75.65

72.65

76.53

76.58

76.85

75.3

77.06

76.2

Total Players

20

17

15

19

21

27

16

18

These are surprisingly even, but as I said before, the correlation of this junk to who wins the game has not been high so far.

My goals for the game are as follows, and remember, I aim high:

Offense:

400 yards rushing

100 yards passing

At least 42 points.

No more than one turnover.

Defense:

No more than 350 total yards.

No more than 21 points.

Force at least 2 turnovers.

Two things. First of all I have no goal for sacks this week. Wilson is such a good scrambler that I dont necessarily want to sack him. As long as we pressure him so he doesnt have time to settle down, and then we contain him so he doesnt kill us running, we will be fine. Also, forcing turnovers will be tough since Wilson throws so few picks (not a single one on the year so far) but this defense is supposed to force them, and I think its about time we see some.

There you have it. If we show up and play like we can, I think it will be an easy win. That’s not really a knock on N.C. St., they are a good team. They just play a style that is very good for us on both sides of the ball.

Can’t wait to see what happens. As a side note, my quick review won’t be up right after the game like usual, because I will be at this game and won't have access to a computer right after. I know everyone is very depressed at that news.

As always, Let’s Go Jackets!

3 comments:

  1. Wow. I don't know where to start.

    "their defense is undersized, but fast and scrappy. That does not matchup well against our offense."

    With all due respect, what planet have you been living on?

    The LB's are fast, quick, and athletic. LB's Audie Cole at 6-5, 239lbs, Terrell Manning at 6-3, 224lbs, and at Nate Irving 6-1, 231lbs, are all dynamic playmakers. Undersized? Hardly.

    The DL is also quick and athletic, especially Sweezy (DT), Reiskamp (DE). Lemon (DT), and Akinniyi (DE). Also noteworthy, especially against the GT offense, the NC State DL is deep. They have an 8-10 man rotation across the defensive front.

    Their size? The top 10 are listed below. Note the measurments. Undersized? Really?

    Jeff Rieskamp DE| 6-3, 245
    Michael Lemon DE| 6-4, 274
    David Akinniyi DE| 6-4, 262
    Audi Augustin DE| 6-2, 256
    A.J. Ferguson DE| 6-2, 279
    Natanu Mageo DT | 6-3, 285
    Markus Kuhn DT | 6-4, 303
    J.R. Sweezy DT | 6-5, 293
    Brian Slay DT | 6-3, 290
    Darryl Cato-Bishop DT | 6-4, 281

    NC State's front 7 matches up extremely well against GT's offense. A quick, athletic front 7, with depth and dynamic playmakers, is ideal to match up against spread option.

    "We are not really a team you can blitz. Blitzes work best against a relatively stationary target, like a QB in the pocket."

    No kidding. Which is why the Wolfpack won't scheme for GT the same way they schemed their past 3 opponents, 2 of which were 'conventional' spread offenses, 1 of which (UCF) provided a more convential run/pass pro style type offense.

    "So they won’t be able to blitz us very well"

    That is an opinion, and "well" is subjective. I'm sure the Wolfpack blitzes will be less frequent than shown in the past 3 games, and I'm sure they will be of a different nature, but time will tell if they are effective.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "They do not have the size to give us problems."

    That size thing again... did I miss something? Is GT's offensive line made up of NFL behemoths? No.

    "On top of all of that, throw in the fact that our offense tends to start clicking sometime around week 4 or 5. 2008 Miss. St. and then last year against UNC were both week 4. "

    Irrelevant. New year, new team, new components, different set of players, new opponent. Too many variables to make the point you are attempting to make.

    "They are a good offense, but they are very much a finesse offense."

    Really? You base this on what? Ever here of Curtis Underwood, Taylor Gentry? Our OL has been a little banged up, and that has effected the play calling somewhat after our starting RT was injured against UCF, but we got our best OL back last week (RJ Mattes, coming back from a knee injury from last year). We play to our strengths, which is Russell Wilson and our receivers, but I'd hardly call our offense a 'finesse offense'.

    "Their running game is based on speed, mostly running wide. They do not power block or power run very well"

    Actually, no. State's most common running plays are inside traps, from inside tackle to inside tackle. With Wilson's talents, he's most often in a shotgun, and thus, most of the running plays are from that formation. It may appear to those with only a cursory glance that NC State runs mostly wide, or does not have an effective power run game, but that is not the case. You are confusing lack of quantity with lack of quality.

    "They aren’t very strong up front, so our weakness is not a huge problem. "

    Really? Size? Again? Where did you derive this idea that State is small and not strong in the trenches? Tom O'Brien is known for developing strong offensive lines. This year, with the available depth, talent, experience, and lack of debilitating injuries (finally), the OL is finally shaping up to one that matches O'Brien's reputation.

    Oh well, Saturday should address your perceptions. I will, however, provide a few measurements of our weak OL.

    Centers
    Camden Wentz | 6-3, 296, So., SQ
    Wayne Crawford | 6-3, 303, Jr., SQ

    Guards
    72 Zach Allen | 6-3, 322, So., SQ
    66 Sam Jones | 6-7, 321, Fr., RS

    Andrew Wallace | 6-5, 304, So., 1V
    Duran Christophe | 6-6, 287, Fr., RS

    Tackles
    R.J. Mattes | 6-6, 303, So., 1V
    Gary Gregory | 6-4, 325, Sr., SQ

    Jake Vermiglio | 6-5, 325, Sr., 3V
    Robert Crisp | 6-7, 312, Fr., HS

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Finally, as bad as we are, we may be the best defense that N.C. St. has played thus far. Cincy and Central Florida do not impress me that much."

    Actually, no again. UCF has a better defense than GT. You shouldn't make so many assumptions. UCF was #4 in the country last year against the run, they returned 7 starters, including their best player and Conference USA’s Defensive Player of the Year. George O'Leary, as any GT fan should know, is a good defensive coach and always fields a solid 'D'.

    What will determine the level of GT's success against NC State is... on defense, can GT pressure and contain Wilson. If not, long day for the Jacket 'D'. The NC State run game is important, if for no other reason than to help w/ time of possession and aid in keeping the Wolfpack 'D' on the sidelines and rested. But it is not paramount, that is, as long as Wilson is being Wislon.

    On offense, GT will need to keep NC State out of the offensive backfield. Penetration kills the spread option. GT should also try to exploit NC State's secondary... both via the option plays to the corner, and the pass. The secondary is young and inexperienced, with 3 sophomore starters and 3 true freshmen in the 2 Deep.

    Other notes:

    NC State's receiver corps is also very talented. Spencer (#13) is the speed threat, and broke his own ACC record last year for avg yards per catch. Williams (#5), is tall and strong. Pre season All ACC pick TE George Bryan has the best hands on the team, and TJ Graham (#6), who set national records in the 100 and 200 in high school, is a speedster track guy who's finally turned into a true receiver in his junior year. He's also a very dangerous return man.

    Both of NC State's starting running backs are freshman.

    NC State biggest weakness, to this point of the season, is the kicking game. Punter Ruiz can boom a 50 yarder, then turn around and boot a 12 yarder with his next kick. The kickoff teams have been improving, but the kick depth and hang time is often found lacking.

    ReplyDelete